1. Frabkena W., Ethics, supra n.2, at pp.34 - 60; Rachels J. The Elements of Moral Philosophy (2nd ed. McGraw-Hili Inc., New York, 1993), pp.90- 116.
2. Peterson and Murdock, "Forensic Sciences Ethics. Developing an Integrated System of Support and Enforcement", 3-4 J. Forensic Sci. 749, at 751(1989).
3. s Code of Ethics for the America i Academy of Forensic Science, 31 (3) J Forensic Sci. 798-799 (1986).
4. "IXth All India Forensic Science Conference", Shimla (1995) Bureau of Police Research and Development, (Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi), p.411.
5. Don Harper Mills, A Special Communication, "Comments from the Perspective of the AAFS Ethics Committee Chairman", 42(6) J Forensic Sci. 1207-1208 (1997).
6. Oliver C. Schroeder. JR, "Ethical and Moral Dimensions in Forensic Science",
7. Journal of Forensic Science Society 27 at pp.31and 32 (1986).
8. John F. Kelly and Phillip K. Wearne, Tainting Evidence: Inside the Scandals at the FBI Crime Lab (The Free Press, Denver Post Online: Books and Authors) 7/2512003 http://63.147.65.175/books/chap17:3.htm
9. Ibid. at pp.8-9.
10. Recently John F. Kelly and Phillip K. Wearne in their article has stated that "In the cauldron of the courtroom, testifying beyond one's expertise becomes common, especially under the FBI's system, where auxiliary examiners, often civilian scientists, actually do the tests, but principal examiners, invariably FBI agents, have tended to do the testifying. All too often the fingerprint expert is invited to comment or even speculate on the bloodstains, the firearms expert on the nature of the bomb explosive, the documents examiner on the tool marks. When only one expert is appearing in a multidiscipline case, it's tempting for prosecutors or defense lawyers to go for an opinion; it's also tempting for examiners to embellish, exaggerate, or even lie about their credentials...." John F. Kelly and Phillip K. Wearne, Tainting Evidence, supra n.9, at p.16.
11. Starrs, "Mountebanks Among Forensic Scientists" in R. Saferstein (ed.) Forensic Science Handbook (1988), pp.7, 20-29.
12. Tracy Peerage Case, 10 CI & F 154 (1843) as cited in James E. Starrs, "The Forensic Scientist and the open mind", 31(2) Journal of Forensic Science SOCiety 111-149 (1991).