( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 58    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS AND ADMINISTRATION

    1 Author(s):  DR MAJNJUNATH

Vol -  1, Issue- 1 ,         Page(s) : 54 - 60  (2010 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Scheduled castes are those castes/races in the country that suffer from extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising out of age-old practice of untouchability and certain others on account of lack of infrastructure facilities and geographical isolation, and who need special consideration for safeguarding their interests and for their accelerated socio-economic development. These communities were notified as Scheduled Castes as per provisions contained in Clause 1 of Article 341 of the Constitution. The term 'Scheduled Tribes' first appeared in the Constitution of India. Article 366 (25) defined scheduled tribes as "such tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within such tribes or tribal communities as are deemed under Article 342 to be Scheduled Tribes for the purposes of this constitution". Article 342, which is reproduced below, prescribes procedure to be followed in the matter of specification of scheduled tribes Constitutional mechanism for upliftment of SC

1. Anand, A. (2012). A Case for Bhim Rajya. Retrieved from www.outlookindia.com 
2. Anand, S. (2005). Visible Dalits, Invisible Brahmins. In Rajan, N. (ed.), Practicing Journalism: Values, Constraints, Implication. Sage Publication. 
3. Anjaneya. R. Bistee, & Gooru, Sreeramulu. (2010). Status of Scheduled Tribes in Karnataka. Indian Streams Research Journal, 3(12), 1-5. 
4. Arles, J. P. (2001). Economic and Social Promotion of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes in India. International Labour, 103(1), 29-64. 
5. Balasubramaniam, J. (2010). Dalits and a Lack of Diversity in the Newsroom, Economic and Political Weekly, 46(11), 73. 
6. Bhat, Umesh. (2005). Status of Dalits from Marginalization to Mainstream. India. Delhi: Vista International. 
7. Chakraborty, Gurupada. (2000). Development of SCs and STs: The Success So Far. Social Change, 30(3-4), 143-162. 
8. Chandra, Vinaya V. (1991). Impact of Development among Jenu Kurabas, Betta Kurubas and Soliga Tribes of Gundlupet Taluk, Chamarajanagara District (M. A. Dissertation). India. Karnataka: University of Mysore. 
9. Chandrashekhar, T. R. (2004). Tribal Development: Some Notes (ed), A.S.Prabhakar, Aesthetics of Tribal Development , Prasaranga, Kannada University, Hampi, Karnataka, India, p.14. 
10. Devindrappa, K., & Rahul, V. Shinde. (2010). Socio-Economic Conditions of Scheduled Tribes in Karnataka. Indian Streams Research Journal, 4(8), 1-2. 

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details