( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 26    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

COMING OF THE DAYS OF MILL IN THE HOOGHLY RIVER-BANK AREA

    1 Author(s):  ARUNAVA SINHA

Vol -  5, Issue- 12 ,         Page(s) : 266 - 282  (2014 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Introduction The history of industrialization in India is a complex story. When Europe in the nineteenth century was going through a phenomenal experience of industrial development India under British rule, losing much of its handicraft industries, was trying to replicate the European industrial production system. The period from 1850 to the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 witnessed the beginning of modern industrial development in India. By modern industry here we mean only an advanced production system considering the technology, organization, and government-regulation involved with it. The number of people and the amount of resource and energy that the modern industrial production system involves is greater than the previous production systems. Thus modern industrial system has reshuffled the social order, manipulated political order, and transformed the physical environment. In India industrial development began in a colonial situation. It was the colonialism for which India’s resources (minerals, crops, forest products etc.) were being siphoned off into the industrial societies, while it was the same colonial connection with Britain, one of the most industrialized nations, which introduced railways and made possible the transplantation of factory system in India.

1. Roy, Tirthankar. 2006. The Economic History of India, 1857-1947. Second Edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press: p. 223
2. Buchanan, D.H. 1966. The Development of Capitalistic Enterprise in India. [First Published in 1934]. London: Frank Cass and Company Limited: p. 118
3.   Dwijendra Tripathi has observed that the entrepreneurs in India had chosen foreign technology to establish industry in spite of the fact that there was no government policy in favoure of any specific technology. It was the colonialism itself which shaped their views in such a way that they cared very little about developing indigenous technology. Tripathi, Dwijendra 1996. “Colonialism and Technology Choices in India: A Historical Overview”. The Developing Economics. [Online]. XXXIV (1). 80-95. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1996.tb00730.x/pdf [Accessed 09 January 2015]: Passim   
4. In the context of the 19th century large-scale industry and modern industry often appear to be synonymous in the standard literature about India’s industrialization. Here I follow Roy who has marked large scale industry as modern but he also identified certain small-scale industries of modern origin which had factory system and used machinery. Roy, Tirthankar 2006: pp.183-184
5. Most of the scholars have accepted that there was not anything in the pre-colonial economy of India which could generate any industrial revolution. Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi 1986. Oupanibeshik Bharater Arthaniti 1850-1947 [Economy of Colonial India, 1850-1947]. Calcutta: Ananda Publishers: p. 86. 
Buchanan told about the necessity of the huge capital and the elaborate technique that could be introduced only by capitalists with the importation of highly specialized skill to aid in industrial operation. He argued that the factories involved in large scale production represented an importation rather than an evolution. Buchanan, D.H.1966: p.119
6. While many considered the black smoke emitting from factory chimneys as signs of `hustle and prosperity’ there were other people who accused it for spoiling citizens’ comfort. Anderson, M.R. 1995. “The Conquest of Smoke: Legislation and Pollution in Colonial Calcutta”. In Nature, Culture, Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia, ed. David Arnold and Ramachandra Guha, 293-335. Delhi: Oxford University Press: Passim
7. Calcutta Review. June 1847. Quoted by Pradip Sinha. The port of Calcutta and Bombay together received a long range of items for shipment from a widely extended hinterland. Sinha, Pradip. 1978. Calcutta in Urban History. Calcutta: Firma K L M Private Ltd.: p. 137
8. P.S. Loknath wrote about an `agglomerating’ tendency of the merchants and traders and most importantly the managing agents in the port towns of Calcutta and Bombay. Actually, it was these people who invested in modern industries at the beginning. Loknath, P.S. 1935. Industrial Organization in India. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.: p. 50
9. John M. Hurd has shown how discriminatory tariff policy influenced trade pattern. In carrying goods to and from the ports rail companies charged lower than the rates which were charged for equal inland distances. Hurd, John M. 2005. “Railways”. In The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2, ed. Dharma Kumar, 737-61. New Delhi: Orient Longman Private Limited: p. 745
10. Localization of industry means concentration of industries in a locality. Loknath 1935: p. 50
11. Loknath, P.S. 1935 : p. 64
12. Then Bengal was the principal producer of raw jute for the world.
13. Managing agency firms generally combined financial, commercial and industrial activities. While in Bombay and in Ahmadabad Indian entrepreneurs had been investing in cotton industries challenging the stake of Manchester in Indian market large British firms had not made such attempt but tried to establish monopoly in the industries like jute textile.
14. Roy, Tirthankar 2006 : pp. 249 – 250
15. Ibid
16. Clow, A.G. 1926. Indian Factory Legislation: A Historical Survey. Calcutta: Government of India Central Publication Branch: p. 10
17. Factory Act provided `the condition of competition’ through `equal restrain on all exploitation of labour’. Chakrabarty, Dipesh 1983. “Conditions for Knowledge of Working-Class Conditions: Employers, Government and the Jute Workers of Calcutta, 1890-1940”. In Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society, ed. Ranajit Guha, 257-310. Delhi: Oxford University press: Pp. 259-260.
18. Buchanan, D.H. 1966: pp. 242-243; 
Morris, Morris D. 2005. “The Growth of Large Scale Industry to 1947”. In The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2, ed. Dharma Kumar, 737-61. New Delhi: Orient Longman Private Limited: p. 567.
19. Goswami, Omkar. 1991. Industry, Trade, and Peasant Society: The Jute Economy of Eastern India, 1900-1947. Delhi: Oxford University Press: p. 2
20. Gadgil, D. R. 1971. The Industrial Evolution of India in Recent Times: 1860-1939. Fifth Edition. Delhi: Oxford University Press: p. 58
21. Loknath, P.S. 1935: p. 64
22. Roy, Tirthankar 2006: p. 250; Goswami, Omkar. 1991: pp. 13-14
23. Gadgil, D. R. 1979: p. 54
24. O’Malley, L. L. S., Chakravarti, Monmohan  1912. Bengal District Gazetteer: Hooghly. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depôt: p. 180
25. Sen, sunil Kumar 1964. Industrial Policy and Development of India (1858-1914). Calcutta: Progressive Publishers: p. 35
Loknath, P. S. 1935: p. 75
O’Malley, L. L. S. 1914: p. 192 
26. Loknath, P. S. 1935: p. 75
27. Tiwari, Lalit 2003. History of Paper Technology in India. [Online]. History of Indian Science and Tecnology. Available: http://www.indianscience.org/essays/t-es-tiwar_paper.shtml [Accessed 9 November 2008]: Passim
28. O’Malley, L. L. S. 1914. Bengal District Gazetteers: 24 Parganas. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depôt: p. 192
29. Sen, Sunil Kumar 1964: p. 37
30. Ibid: 70
31. Ibid
32. Ibid: 96
33. Ibid: 124-125
34. O’Malley, L. L. S., Chakravarti, Monmohan. 1909. Bengal District Gazetteers: Howrah. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depôt: p. 105
35. O’Malley, L. L. S. 1914. Bengal District Gazetteers: 24 Parganas. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depôt: pp. 192-193
36. Report of the Indian Industrial Commission, 1916-18. Quoted in Sen, Sunil Kumar 196: pp. 124-125
37. Ibid
38. Buchanan, D. H. 1966: p. 57; Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi 1986: pp. 110-111 
39. Gadgil, Madhab, Guha, Ramachandra. 2007. This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. In The Use and Abuse of Nature, Omnibus Edition. Oxford India Paperback. New Delhi: Oxford University Press: pp. 39-40
40. Ibid: p. 40     

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details