1. Gebbie,K.M.( 2007). Defining Interdisciplinary Research:Conclusions from a Critical Review ofthe Literature.
2. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004).Interdisciplinary Integration in Europe: The
3. case of the Fifth Framework Programme.Futures 36, 457-470.
4. Feller, I. (2006).Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria:Issues in assessing
5. interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15, 5–15.
6. Gardner, H. (2006). Five Minds for the Future.Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Golding, C. (2009). Integrating the Disciplines: Successful Interdisciplinary Subjects. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Available in electronic form from
8. Henry, S. (2005). Disciplinary hegemony meets interdisciplinary ascendancy: Can
9. interdisciplinary/integrative studies survive, and if so, how?
10. Pellmar, T. C., & Eisenberg, L., editors.Bridging Disciplines in the Brain,Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US);
11. Brockbank, A. and McGill, I. (1998), Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education, Societyfor Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia,
12. Bruffee, K. (1993), Collaborative Learning:Higher Education, Interdependence and the Authority
13. Of Knowledge, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, London.
14. Donald, J. (1997), Improving the Environment for Learning:Academic Leaders Talk about What
15. Works,Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
16. Evensen, D.H. and Hmelo, C.E. (2000), Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on
17. Learning Interactions, L.Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
18. Fien, J. (2002), “Advancing sustainability in higher education: issues and opportunities for
19. Research”, Higher Education Policy, Vol. 15, pp. 143-52.
20. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ijad Volume 1, Issue 1 (Fall 2013)
21. www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister
22. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/4/45575516.pdf