( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 61    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

THE 'IMPACT OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT ON HINDU AND MUSLIM LAWS.

    1 Author(s):  DR. SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

Vol -  7, Issue- 9 ,         Page(s) : 24 - 28  (2016 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The Artcile is associated with the impact of the Indian Contract Act on Hindu & Muslim Laws. It is noteworthly here that Contract Act also effects the personal laws whether they may be covered in Hindu or Muslim statutes. Impact of Indian Contract Act on personal laws will be dealt with thoroughly from di: erent angles by taking various positions of the Act in the light of salient features and main peculiarities of the Indian Contract Act.

1. Candaswamy Mudalay v. Mcleod, (1826); Torah Rangiah v. 
     Chanchamma, (1824) I. M. Dec. 482.
2. Dada Bhose v. Minim, (1822) I. M. Dec. 482.
3. Sri Narain Rai v Bhya Jha, ( 1872) 2 SDA 23.
4. Mihirwanjee v. Wuluthdoss, (1822) 2 Burr 240.
5. Rai Balgovind v. Sheik Ghulam Ali, (1805) ISDA 93. G.
6. Jamoonah Raur v. Mudder Day, (1785) Hydes Notes 143.
7. Rajah Jaiprakash Singh v. Jug Rai Sahoo, ( 181 1 ) ISAD Rep 343.
8. Bose Shah v. Rajkurnar (1812) 1 Burr 93. 
9. Gopu Charan Bural v. Mt. LT Dibia, ( I 821 ) 3 SDA Rep. 93.
10. Hurree Kissen v. Ranchos ( 1 811 ) Sel Rep. 10.
11. Kam a Kant Chackraburty v. Guru Govind Chowdree, 4. SDA Rep. 322.
12. Kallupnath Singh v. Kamla Pat „Ma. ( 1829) 4 SDA 339.
13. Nundlal Bhagwandass v Topeedas. ( 1809) Borr
14; Kumea Bahoo v. Munne Shankar, ( 1 824) 2 Buyrr 687. 14. Rai Balgovind v.' Sheik Ghulam Ali, (1805) 1SDA Rep 63.
15. Saiyad Ghulam Ruzur v. Aja Bhaee, 1 Burr 367. 
16. Ram Ghulam Singh v. Keerut Singh, (1828) 4. SDA Rep 12.
17. Keshav Rao Diwaker v. Naio Junardhan Patnukat; (1882) 2 Burr 194.
18. Randal Thakoor Seydoss v. Soojamull Dhond Mull, 1847 Perry's Notes of     Cases 18.
19. Shureef Ahmad v Fakeer Sahib, (1821 ) Mad Dec. 280. 
20. Wijoo Bhas v. Jaee Bhaee, ( 1819) 1 Borr 310.
21. In re Goods of Peacock, ( 1781 ).
22. Part v. Mootiah, (1799) I Str 3.
23. Horsely v. Perraaw Chamb, Notes ( 1 791 ) Mor 369. 
24. Hullodh Chose v. G.L. Tagore, (1844) 1 Poulton 41 1.
25.Sanchander Chatteijee v F. W Biddle, (1851 ). 
26. Manickram Chottopadhaya v. M.C. All Khan Hydes Notes (1789) Sm. R. 53 Mor 125. 
27. Waston v. Chandraney, (1779). 
28. Greedur Baboo v. Sree Lucheenundan Dass.
29. Gooroo Prasad Bose v. Hobberly, (1815) East's Notes Case 32.
30. B. MuHick v. Stubb, ( 1821 ) East's Notes Case 28.
31. Agha Mohammad Mohadustie v. Start Gopal, Mookandass, 1 (805) I Mad   
      Dec. 1 Saddar Court Madras.
43. Waghela Rajsanji v. Sheik Mohideen, ( 1887) 14 IA 89. 
44. Dandu v. Narayana, (1863) 1 B NC 47 Aj it Saheb v. Shahji, (1895) 21 Born 
     85.
45. Nobin Chandar V. Ramesh Chander, (1887) 14 CAI 761.
46. HegNarain v. Ram Devi, (1833) 12 CLR S90.
47. Annaji Row v. Ragubat, (1883) 6 Mad HC 400. 
48. Madheva Sidhanta v. Venkata Ramnujulu, ( 1901 ) 26 Mad 662. 
49. KunjaLal v. Narasamba, (1915) 42 Cal 826. 
50. Jeewan Bhai v. Manordass, (1910) 35 Bom 199. Soundanappa v. Shir 
asaiva, ( 1907) 3 1 Born 354.
 52. Subramanyam Ayyar v. Subramanya Ayyar ( 1.908) 1 8 MLJ 245.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details