( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 134    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREATIVITY OF ELEMENTARY TEACHERS WHO ARE TRAINING STUDENTS FROM SENIOR SECONDARY STUDENTS OF PUNJAB RELATING TO THEIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

    1 Author(s):  SWATI

Vol -  8, Issue- 3 ,         Page(s) : 66 - 75  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Creativity is a universal ability. In is present in some manner is everyone. When it is available in moderate degree, it is not conspicuously perceptible. In the case of excellence it becomes perceptible. To find out the socio-economic status of the students in the present study the SESS that could be easily and objectively measure the socio-economic status of the students in different situations of the society and group life was required in this research study. For this research study sample was taken for Schools who’s ETT and +2 students take education. Socio-economic status of students do not effect significantly to their achievement.

1. Abruzzo, E (1987). Influence of Training in Creative Thinking and Problem Solving on the Creative Behaviour of Fifth Grade Pupils. Hofstra Univ. Dissertation Abstract International. 49(7). pp 1679-1696
2. Awasthi. V (1989). Developing Training Strategy for Science Teaching by using Concept Attainment Model, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), DAW, Indore Badrinath, S., and Satyanarayan, S.B. (). Correlates of Creative Thinking of High School Students.
3. Baer, John, M (1988). Long Term Effects of Creativity Training of Middle School Students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, No. 2 Balasuramanian. N. (1939). A Study of Classroom Climate in Relation to Pupils Achievement in English at Higher Secondary stage (Doctoral dissertation, Education). Bharathear University.
4. Barron. F. (1952). Creativity and Psychological Health. D. Van Nostrand Company Inc, Princiton, New Jersey.
5. Best, J.W & Kahn, J.V (2005). Research in Education. Pearson Publication, New Delhi
6. Chitkara, M (1985). To Study the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Teaching on Achievement in Mathematics in Relation to Intelligence, Sex and Personality. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), Pan. Univ., Panjee 
7. Cicirelli, V.G. (1967). Sibling Conatilation, Creativity, IQ and Academic Achievement. Chllfl Development. 38, 481-490.
8. Cramond. M. and Bonnie, T (1994). The Torrance tests of creative Thinking from design through establishment of predictive validity. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 81(17), 81-88.
9. Cropley. David; Cropley, Arthur (2010). Recognizing and Fostering Creativity in Technological Design Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20 (3) p345-358.
10. Daram. V.J. (1970). Creativity and Intelligence ; Research Implications for Equal Emphasis is High School. Exceptional Children, ol- 34.
11. Das, K.S. (1996). Creativity and Gender Differences Among Collegiate, Indian Education 31(1), 137-14.
12. Deshmukh, M.N (1980). Analytical Study of Some Scholastic Conditions and Practices as Contributory Factors to Creative Ability. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, D.U. Delhi.
13. Dussart. G. B. J. (1990). Creativity in the Language of Biology. Journal of Biological Education, 24 (4) p277-82.
14. Edward. M.P., and Tryler, L.E. (1965). Intelligence, Creativity and Achievement in a Non-Selected Public Junior High School. Journal q! Educational Psychology, 56, 2, 96-99.
15. Freud. S. (1947). Accentuate the positive and the (egative : Re-thinking the use of self esteem. self deprecation and self-confidence social psychology, Quarterly, 56(4) 288-299.
16. Gangoli. S.G. and Gurumurthy, C (1985). A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Open Ended Approach at Higher Secondary Stage. R.C.E., Mysore 
17. Gerett, H.E (2005). Statistics in Psychology and Education. Paragon International Publishers. New Delhi.
18. Gupta. A.K. (1974). Creative Research in India and Its Past and Future. Future Creativity News 3(1).
19. Gupta. A.K., and Sharma, S. (1982). Creativity, Intelligence and Socio-Economic Status. Indian Educational Review, 17(1).
20. Halman. R. J. (1973). The (necessary and sufficient Conditions for Creativity, Journal of Psychology 3(1). in Holliday, M.A.K., Classroom London.
21. Koul, L (2006). Methodology of Educational Research. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., Delhi
22. Lin, Chongde; Hu, Weiping; Adey, Philip; Shen, Jiliang (2003). The Influence of CASE on Scientific Creativity. Research in Science Education, 33 (2) pi43-62. Livingston. Larry (2010). Teaching Creativity in Higher Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111 (2) p59-62.
23. Martis, Anadi (1989). Developing Making the Strange Familiar (MSF) Competent through Synectics Model of Teaching in Graduate Student Teachers and Study of their Reactions and the Reactions of Pupils. Unpublished Doct Thesis, DAW. Indore, M.P.
24. Miller. James E., Jr. (1974). Everyman with a Blue Guitar: Imagination, Creativity, Language. ADE Bulletin, 43, 38-43.
25. Mishra, B.C. (1986). Relationship Between Creativity And Problem Solving Ability At Different Levels of Intelligence. Indian Education Review., 21 (4).
26. Passi, B.K., and Lalitha, M.L. (1975). A Factorial Study Creativity, Intelligence and Self- Concept Adolescents. Psychological studies 1975
27. Patel, R.P (1988). Development of Brainstorming Technique Programme and to study its Effects on Creativity of the Secondary School children. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), S.P.U.
28. Raina, M.K (1969). Creativity Research in India: An analysis. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 3
29. Ribot. W.C. (1900). Birth order and its sequel. Journal of child development, 4(2), 44-49.
30. Ross. William T. (1978). Language, Metaphor, and Creativity in Discursive Prose. Freshman English News, 7 (2) p21 -24.
31. Saxena, M., and Sharma, V.K- (1986). An Empirical Investigation into Adjustment Patterns of Hign and Low Creative Adolescents, Hanas, 22 .; 1-2., 65-73.
32. Sharma, A.K. and Jarial. A S. (1980). Factorial Study of the Effect of SES, Grade Levels And Their Interaction upon Creativity and Its Components. Trends in Education., 7(1 & 2, 37-42.
33. Sood. R. (1985). Personality Correlates of Scientific Creativity and Academic Achievement In Relation To Levels of Aspiration. M. Phil Dissertation, K.U,.
34. Thomson. Pat; Sanders, Ethel (2010). Creativity and Whole School Change: An Investigation of English Headteacher Practices. Journal of Educational Change, 11 (1) p63-83.
35. Thrustone, L.L. (1952). Creative Talent Application Psychology, Harper and Row, Hew York.
36. Triffinger, D.J. (1986). Research on Creativity. Gifted Child quarterly, 30(1).
37. Verma, Bipin Chander (1991). Effects of Personalized System of Instruction and Bloom's Mastery Learning Strategy on Achievement and Certain Non-Cognitive Variables of Students. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), H.P.Univ., Himachal Pradesh
38. Young, T. and Leonard, M. (1994). Relations between creativity and intelligence among Malaysian Pupils Perceptual and Motor Skills 79(2), 739-742.
39. Yudess, Jo (2010). Colleges and Universities with Degree or Certificate Bearing Programs in Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44 (2) pi39-142 Second Quarter.
40. Zampetakis, Leonidas A.; Bouranta, Nancy; Moustakis, Vassilis S. (2010). On the Relationship between Individual Creativity and Time Management. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1) p23-32.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details