( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 314    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

EFFECT OF PERCEIVED INDIVIDUALISTIC AND COLLECTIVISTIC VALUES ON THE PSYCHOSOCIAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION CAPACITY OF PEOPLE IN MANIPUR.

    2 Author(s):  HALLEY SINGH THOKCHOM, ANAND PRATAP SINGH

Vol -  7, Issue- 12 ,         Page(s) : 223 - 232  (2016 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to show whether people’s tendencies towards individualistic and/or collectivistic values have any significant impact on the way these people would resolve psychosocial conflicts. The part of culture that highlights the tendency of human nature to imbibe individualistic and/or collectivistic tendencies will further shed light on how psychosocial conflicts are viewed and handled. Collectivistic values emphasise on the distinction between in-groups and out-groups, focus on what people have in common and engage in cooperative tasks. Individualistic values, on the other hand characterises a distinct individual, emphasising on competitive tasks.

  1. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle: Areissue. NewYork: Norton.
  2. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating an agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). London: Random House Business Books.
  3. Henning, M. (2003). Evaluation of the Conflict Resolution Questionnaire. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business: Auckland University of Technology.
  4. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Kim, M., Sharkey, W. F., & Singelis, T. M. (1994). The relationship between individuals’ self-construals and perceived importance of interactive constraints. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 117-140.
  6. McClelland, J. (1997a, February 20). The Conflict Resolution Questionnaire. Retrieved 2002, from http://www.qvctc.commnet.edu/classes/ssci121/questnr.html
  7. McClelland, J. (2002, February 20). Scoring the Conflict Resolution Questionnaire. Retrieved from http://www.qvctc.commnet.edu/classes/ssci121/lrnsrvy.html
  8. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
  9. Trinadis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). The evolution of individualism and collectivism theory and research. (V. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins, Eds.) Theories in social psychology, 498-520.
  10. Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., Greenfield, P. M., & Quiroz, B. (2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  11. Weeks, D. (1994). The eight steps to conflict resolution. New York: Tarcher/Putman.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details