( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 88    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

CONJUGAL RIGHTS OF PRISONERS: IMPRISONMENT DOES NOT MEAN FAREWELL TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

    2 Author(s):  BHAVANA C.M DHOUNDIYAL, C. SUGANYA JEBA SAROJINI

Vol -  7, Issue- 12 ,         Page(s) : 233 - 249  (2016 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Traditionally, the right of prisoners to have visitors while incarcerated has been strictly limited by prison authority. The liberalizing trend of judicial decisions over the years regarding visitors and associations have been drastically curtailed by such cases as Sandin v. Conner ,1 which held that only state created liberty interests were constitutionally protected. However, limits on the rights of prison authorities to search visitors remain viable, either on the fourth amendment grounds or privacy grounds.

1.    S.N. Mishra – The Code of Criminal Procedure
2.    N.V.Pranjape – The Code of Criminal Procedure
3. Mr. Prashanth S.J, Hindu Women And Restitution Of Conjugal Rights: Do We Need The Remedy
4. Jaspal Singh, Law of Marriage and Divorce in India, (1983)
5. Paras Diwan, Law of Marriage & Divorce
6. United Nations Standards Guidelines & International Instruments 
7. S.A. Desai, Mulla Hindu Law,
8. R. C. Nagpal, Modern Hindu Law, (1983)
9. Legal Prison Manual
10. Jail manual
11. Human Rights & Civil Liberties (Steve Foster)  
12. Rights of the accused by Mr. Ashutosh trivedi
13. Indian Prison Laws and Correction of Prisoners by Nitai Roy Chowdhury
14. Douglas Blackmon, Slavery by Another Name
15. Lok Sabha Debates , Mrs. Renu Chakravarthy , 1955
16. The New York Times article on convicts and prison system
17. The Hague Conventions (216(21) per Sir William Scott)
18. All India Reporter Andhra Pradesh, 1983 
19. All India Reporter Delhi, 1984 
20. All India Reporter Supreme Court ,1984 
21. All India Reporter Delhi, 1984 
22. All India Reporter Andhra Pradesh, 1983 
23. All India Reporter Madras, 1924
24. Ail India Reporter 1967, Supreme Court
25. Supreme Court Cases 1973
26. All India Reporter Supreme court, 1977
27. All India Reported Supreme Court, 1977 
28. All India Reporter (1978,1980), Supreme court Reporter

Other references/Articles
1. Madhurima 2009. Rights behind bars; Landmark Judicial pronouncement and national human rights commission guidelines. Ed: Swati Mehta, Pub: Common wealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi.
2. Krishna Iyer VR 1984. Human Rights and the Law, Indore: Vedpal Law House
3. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) 1955. Available online at http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/pdf/treatmentprisoners.pdf (Accessed on 15 march, 2015)
4. The Conjugal Right 2010. Article published in TImes of India on 14.01.2010. Availabe online at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Why-cant-prisoners-have-sexin-jails-court-asks-Maharashtra-govt/articleshow/5445590.cms Accessed on 24 Mar 2010
5. Punjab & Haryana high court : Reproduction available despite imprisonment, Nishita golccha (www.legaltrigger.com)
6. Foreign cases and citations through Wikipedia/encyclopedia/Britannica.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details