( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 155    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

ESTIMATION OF SATISFACTION LEVEL FOR WORKERS’ PARTICIPATION IN MANGEMENT: A CASE OF SUGAR MILLS OF HARYANA

    1 Author(s):  DR. KULDEEP SINGH

Vol -  9, Issue- 5 ,         Page(s) : 11 - 17  (2018 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The workers participation in management has become a part of policy matter for the management .The workers of modern era can no longer be considered a cog in the machine. At the same time mounting interest from different researchers, academicians and human resource practitioners, workers’ participation in management has become equally significant for management and the workers. Management understands that workers participation is imperative for an enterprise and it brings common understanding, higher productivity, industrial harmony, and finally helps satisfying and motivating workers in the interest of the organization. Workers more happily follow decisions they have made themselves, having known better what is expected of them. Through this research paper an attempt has been made to analyse the workers satisfaction from their participation in management in sugar mills of Haryana. The result shows that satisfaction from workers participation is very high when workers get good cooperation from supervisors, their suggestions are followed up by supervisors and they have a trust that strikes are no good.

  1. Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work. Human Relations,39(11), 1005-1016. doi:10.1177/001872678603901104
  2. Levine, D. (1990). Participation, Productivity, and the Firm’s Environment. California management review, 32(4), 86-100.doi:2307/41166630.
  3. Rad, A.M., & Yarmohammadian, M.H. (1997). A study of relationship between managers’ leadership style and employees’ job satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, 19(2), 11-28.doi:10.1108/13660750610665008
  4. Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggatt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall,, M. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1988). Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 8-22. Doi:10.2307/258351
  5. Witt, L. A., Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). The Role of Participation in Decision-Making in the Organizational Politics-Job Satisfaction Relationship. Human Relations, 53(3), 341-358 . doi:10.1177/0018726700533003
  6. Wagner, J. A. (1994). Participation’s Effects on Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of Research Evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 312-330. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/ d i s c o v e r / 1 0 . 2 3 0 7 / 2 5 8 7 0 7 ? u i d = 3 7 3 8 2 5 6 & uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103721.
  7. Appelbaum, S. H., Louis, D., Makarenko, D., Saluja, J., Meleshko, O., & Kulbashian, S. (2013). Participation in decision making: a case study of job satisfaction and commitment. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(4), 222-329. doi: 10.1108/001978513113510 
  8. Bhuiyan, M. (2012). Employee Participation in Decision Making in RMG sector of Bangladesh: Correlation with Motivation and Performance. Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka), 5(2), 122-132. doi:10.3329/ jbt.v5i2.9984.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details