( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 107    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

AGONY IN WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS

    1 Author(s):  VISHAL ARVINDBHAI PATEL

Vol -  10, Issue- 6 ,         Page(s) : 338 - 346  (2019 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

When it comes to the characterizations of Shakespearean plays, scholars consider his ones as an outstanding presentation of the human psychological conflict which also portrays lunacy, self-delusional features and illusion as well. Shakespeare with his immortal uniqueness paints a subtle climax for his characters that often ends tragically. Several scholars gave credit to the anticipatory discoveries of human psychology in the 20th century for the Shakespearian knowledge about such phenomena. Although, Shakespeare is undoubtedly the maestro of this genre and has a great analytical ability to represent the world the directions for resolving issues virtually with the help of his brilliant literature. However, an author and dramatist like Shakespeare can have different insights in many instances that become unique for his excellence. His thoughts were not narrow or orthodox and he accepted ideas from everywhere. This thesis is all about studying his dramas’ agony and painful tragedies from a research perspective.

1. Colie, Rosalie Littell (1974). Shakespeare's Living Art: Othello and the Problematic of Love. Prince-ton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x15ww.7
2. Bradley, A. C. (1905). Shakespearean tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Mac-beth. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan. Pp. 1-480.
3. Kottman, Paul A. (2009). Philosophers on Shakespeare. Stanford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ps/books
4. Nevo, R. (2015). Tragic Form in Shakespeare: Princeton Legacy Library. Princeton: Princeton Uni-versity Press.
5. Adade-Yeboah, A., Ahenkora, K., & Amankwah, A. S. (2012). The Tragic Hero of the Classical Pe-riod. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 10-17.
6. ORKIN, M. R. (1979). MODES OF SPEAKING IN SHAKESPEARE'S TRAGEDIES. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 53, 59-69.
7. Ribner, I. (2013). Patterns in Shakespearian Tragedy. London: Routledge.
8. Johnson, S. (2005). Mr. Johnson's Preface to his Edition of Shakespeare’s plays (ONLINE RE-PRINT). Ian Lancashire OCLC 10834559.
9. Hawkes, T. (1977). Twentieth century interpretations of Macbeth: a collection of critical essays. Michigan: University of Michigan: Prentice-Hall.
10. A.C. Bradley: Shakespearean tragedy: 2004 Atlantic publishers and distributors, 3-9.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details