( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 144    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

NAFTA- A ROLE MODEL FOR MAKING TRADE GREEN

    1 Author(s):  DR. VINEET PRAKASH

Vol -  10, Issue- 4 ,         Page(s) : 512 - 533  (2019 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The damage caused to the environment by activities of human beings is a major source of concern in contemporary world politics. While there is increasing awareness about the anthropogenic impact on planet earth, efforts to control and check this damage are thwarted by constraints arising from concerns about such measures adversely affecting economic growth. The negotiation and signing of NAFTA in 1992 assumes special significance in this context. NAFTA became the first trade agreement in which an effort was made to link the conduct of trade to environmental standards with a view to limiting the damage caused by trade to environment. This study attempts to understand why and under what circumstances, the US trade policy shifted course to make environment an integral part of NAFTA. Of special interest is the role played by NGO’s in aiding this transition. With this, NAFTA charted a new course in the direction of achieving economic growth for all without endangering the global commons.

  1. (*Primary Source)
  2. Abbott, Frederick M., (2000) “NAFTA and the Legalization of World Politics: A Case Study,” International Organization, 54(3): 519-547.
  3. Avery, William P. (1998), “Domestic Interests in NAFTA Bargaining,” Political Science Quarterly, 113(2): 281-305.
  4. Blum, Jonathan S., (2000) “The FTAA and the Fast track to Forgetting the Environment: A Comparison of the NAFTA and the MERCOSUR Environmental Models as Examples for the Hemisphere,” Texas International Law Journal, 35 (3): 435-458.
  5. Fox, Annette Baker, (1995) “Environment and Trade: The NAFTA Case,” Political Science Quarterly, 110(1): 49-69.
  6. * George Bush: “Letter to Congressional Leaders on Fast Track Authority Extension and the North American Free Trade Agreement,” May 1, 1991. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.  http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=19533
  7. * George Bush: “Letter to Congressional Leaders on the North American Free Trade Agreement,” September 18, 1992. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.  http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=21475
  8. Kutler, L. & Stanley. W., The Wars of Watergate: The Last Crisis of Richard Nixon, (New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1990)
  9. * NAFTA, (1993), North American Free Trade Agreement, 1993. URL: http://http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org
  10. Porras, Ileana M., (1995) “The Puzzling Relationship between Trade and Environment: NAFTA, Competitiveness, and the Pursuit of Environmental Welfare Objectives,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 3(1): 65-79
  11. Rosenbaum, A. Walter, Environmental Politics and Policy, (Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1998.)
  12. Skonieczny, Amy (2001), “Constructing NAFTA: Myth, Representation, and the Discursive Construction of U.S. Foreign Policy,”
 International Studies Quarterly, 45(3): 433-454.
  13. Sundquist James, Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson Years, (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 1968)
  14. Tamayo-Flores, Rafael (2001), “Mexico in the Context of the North American Integration: Major Regional Trends and Performance of Backward Regions,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 33(2): 377-407.
  15. Zahniser Steven & Crago Zachary (2009), NAFTA at Fifteen: Building on Free Trade, Economic Research Service/US Department of Agriculture, WRS-09-03: 1-56. www.ers.usda.gov

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details