|
IMPACT OF JOB AUTONOMY ON WORK OUTCOMES: REVIEW OF MEDIATORS AND MODERATORS
3
Author(s):
GURVINDER KAUR,MUGDHA JHINGAN,VASUSHRI MODY
Vol - 10, Issue- 4 ,
Page(s) : 544 - 549
(2019 )
DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH
Abstract
The paper studies the literature to find out the process through which autonomy impacts work outcomes. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between job autonomy and job performance and job autonomy and job satisfaction. Further intrinsic motivation has served as a moderator between job autonomy and job performance. Task interdependence influences the relationship between individual and team autonomy. Job autonomy and job performance is mediated by self-monitoring as well. Findings of the literature review suggest that; self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, task interdependence and self-monitoring mediate and moderate relationship between job autonomy and work outcomes; while
Researchers found that Self-efficacy does not mediate relationship between job autonomy and job stress, autonomy and teamwork KSAs interaction in predicting performance and strain was not supported and that degree of autonomy does not mediate the relationship between levels of autonomy, nature of personality and job performance
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of applied Psychology, 78(1), 111.
- Bizzi, L., & Soda, G. (2011). The paradox of authentic selves and chameleons: Self‐monitoring, perceived job autonomy and contextual performance. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 324-339.
- Cai, W., Song, W., & Zhao, S. (2013). An empirical study on the effects of creative personality and job autonomy on individual innovation performance of knowledge workers. International Business and Management, 6(2), 24-30.
- Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Günsel, A. (2011). Promoting creativity among employees of mature industries: The effects of autonomy and role stress on creative behaviors and job performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 889-895.
- Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2011). Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 367-387
- Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., & Dysvik, A. (2016). Performance management: Perceiving goals as invariable and implications for perceived job autonomy and work performance. Human Resource Management, 55(3), 401-412.
- Langfred, C. W. (2005). Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of management, 31(4), 513-529.
- Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 934.
- Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., Rogelberg, S. G., & Jackson, P. R. (2005). Team autonomy, performance, and member job strain: Uncovering the teamwork KSA link. Applied Psychology, 54(1), 1-24
- Saragih, S. (2015). The effects of job autonomy on work outcomes: Self efficacy as an intervening variable. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 4(3).
|