( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 83    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

A REVIEW OF ANALYTICAL MODELS, APPROACHES AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT, MONITORING AND CONTROL

    1 Author(s):  DR. SHAKINA TABBSUM A. MUNSHI

Vol -  10, Issue- 7 ,         Page(s) : 263 - 274  (2019 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

This paper reviews the problems,approaches and analytical models on projectcontrol systems and discusses the possible research extensions. The discussion could help to identify open problems and research areas with wide practical applications which require further research.Furthermore, the conclusionssummarized might serve as a useful base for developing decision support systems (DSS) that will contribute project managersin planning and controllingunder uncertain project environments.

• Acebes, F., Pajares, J., Galan, J.M., Lopez-Paredes, A., 2014. A new approachfor project control under uncertainty. going back to the basics.
International Journal of Project Management 32, 423 – 434
• Bausch, G.T., Chung, C.A., 2001. A statistical project control tool for engineeringmanagers. Project Management Journal 32, 37–44.
• Bowman, R.A., 2006. Developing activity duration specification limits foreffective project control. European Journal of Operational Research 174,1191 – 1204.
• Chang, C.W., Tong, L.I., 2013. Monitoring the software development processusing a short-run control chart. Software Quality Journal 21, 479–499.
• Cioffi, D.F., 2005. A tool for managing projects: an analytic parameterizationof the S-curve. International Journal of Project Management 23, 215 – 222.
• Cohen, I., Golany, B., Shtub, A., 2005. Managing stochastic, finite capacity,multi-project systems through the cross-entropy methodology. Annals ofOperations Research 134, 183–199.
• Davidovitch, L., Parush, A., Shtub, A., 2010. Simulator-based team trainingto share resources in a matrix structure organization. IEEE Transactionson Engineering Management 57, 288 –300.
• Farris, J., Groesbeck, R., Van Aken, E., Letens, G., 2006. Evaluating the relativeperformance of engineering design projects: A case study using dataenvelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53,471 –482.
• Fleming, Q., Koppelman, J., 2005. Earned Value Project Management.Project Management Institute. 3 edition.
• Golenko-Ginzburg, D., Gonik, A., 1997. On-line control model for networkconstruction projects. ”Journal of the Operational Research Society 48,175–183.
• Kwaka, Y.H., Ingall, L., 2007. Exploring Monte Carlo simulation applicationsfor project management. Risk Management 9, 44–57.
• Lauras, M., Marques, G., Gourc, D., 2010. Towards a multi-dimensionalproject performance measurement system. Decision Support Systems 48,342 – 353.
• Nowicki, E., Zdrzalka, S., 1984. Optimal control policies for resource allocationin an activity network. European Journal of Operational Research16, 198 – 214.
• Olson, D.L., 2008. Multi-criteria decision support, in: Handbook on DecisionSupport Systems 1. Springer, pp. 299–314.
• Pajares, J., Lopez-Paredes, A., 2011. An extension of the evm analysis forproject monitoring: The cost control index and the schedule control index.International Journal of Project Management 29, 615 – 621.
• Williams, T., 2003. The contribution of mathematical modelling to the practiceof project management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics14, 3–30.
• Zwikael, O., Ahn, M., 2011. The effectiveness of risk management: Ananalysis of project risk planning across industries and countries. RiskAnalysis 31, 25–37.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details