( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 185    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

A STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZER MODEL TO TEACH HINDI GRAMMAR

    1 Author(s):  SHREENDER KUMAR

Vol -  4, Issue- 1 ,         Page(s) : 88 - 91  (2013 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Teaching is a mission to enlighten the pupils and to make them efficient in life situations. Without a doubt, the teaching fraternity has a great role in upbringing a good citizen. The teacher has greater responsibility in carrying out the task of teaching a language. Though Mark Twain once remarked ‘it is the classmates who really educate the child’, but the role of teacher is, by no mean, less. The Advance Organizer Model to teach a subject is quite effective. A sample of 100 students from Saini School, Rewari was selected to study the effectiveness of Advance Organizer Model to teach Hindi Grammar. it was found that the Advance Organizer Model (AOM) of teaching is more effective than the traditional method. Students learn more by teaching through AOM as their achievement shows and difference in achievement does not depend upon sex.

1. Ausubel, D.P. quoted in Weil, M. and Joyce, B., Information Processing Model of Teaching, Prentice hall Inc., New Jersey, 1979.
2. Ausubel, D.P., in Defence of Advance Organizers : A Reply to the critics, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 48, No.2, 1978.
3. Ausubel, D.P., The Psychology of Meaningful verbal learning New York, Grune and Stratton, Inc., 1963.
4. Brady, Lauri, Models and Methods of Teaching, Prentice Hall of Australia Pvt. Limited, 1985.
5. Bruner, J.S; The Process of Education, Atma Ram and Sons, Delhi -5, 1`964.
6. Clark, D.C, Teaching concepts in the class room: a set of teaching prescriptions derived from experimental research. Jr. of  Edu. Psy. Jan. 1971; 62, 3, 253-78.
7. Chaudhari, U.S., Effect of Advance Organizer on learning from Text in relation to sex and socio-economic status Indian Educational Review, 1985.
8. Dececco, J, The Psychology of Learning and Instruction. Edu. Psy., Englewood cliff’s. N.J. Prentice Hall, 1968.
9. Eggen Paul, D., Kauchak, D.P.; Harden, R.J., Strategies for teachers – Informating Processing Models in the class room, Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliff N.J. 1979.
10. Garrett, H.E., Statistics in Psychology and Education. Vakils, Feffer and Simon Ltd. Bombay. 1966.
11. Hunt, E.B., Concept Learning: An information processing problem. John Willey & Sons, 1962.
12. Joyce, Bruce and Weil, Marsha, Advance Organizer Model, Models of Teaching Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1972.
13. Kaur, Rajinder Pal, 1991, Effectiveness of Bruner and Ausubel Models for teaching of concepts in Economics to high and low achieving students across creativity levels. Ph. D. II Edu., Punjabi University.
14. Mahajan, Jyotsna, 1992, A Comparative Study of the effectiveness of two models of teaching, viz, Bruner’s Concept Attainment Model and Ausubel’s Advance Organizer Model on teaching abilities of student teachers and on achievement of students in various schools, Ph.D., Edu. Shreemati nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women’s University.
15. Panda B.B.; Comparative Study of the Effect of Advance Organizer and set-induction on learning. Unpublished M.Phil Dissertation, Davi Ahilya University, Indore, 1986.
16. Sood, Kamala; (1990), Comparison of Advance Organizer and reception strategies for acquisition of Language concepts in relation to cognitive style, intelligence and creativity. Ph.D. Edu., Punjab University.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details