( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 349    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

CAVEAT EMPTOR TO CAVEAT VENDITOR IN THE PROCESS....

    2 Author(s):  MS. SOWMYA CHRISTINA , DR. PRAKASH MUNISHAMAPPA

Vol -  5, Issue- 5 ,         Page(s) : 430 - 436  (2014 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The study focuses on the principle of Caveat Venditor (Sellers Beware), the reasons behind the emergence of this concept and its implications. With Caveat Venditor gaining more and more importance, are we moving towards consumer sovereignty? In order to understand this principle, one must know the reasons for decline of Caveat Emptor (Buyers Beware) with cases which paved way to the rule of Caveat Venditor.

order online

Cases
1. Wallis v. Russell [1902] 2 IR 585
2. Laidlaw v. Organ 15 U.S. 178 (1817)
3. Ward v. Hobbs. (1878) 4 A.C. 13
4. Priest v Last (1903)2K.B.148
5. Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 
6. Wright v. Hart, 18 Wend. (N. Y.) 449

Books

1. P. Ramanatha Aiyar, Advanced Law Lexicon, page 721, 3rd Edition, 2005
2. T S Venkatesa Iyer, The Law of Contract, Vol. 2, 5th Edition.
3. Michael Bridge, Sale of Goods, 2nd Edition, 2009 
4. P. Ramanatha Aiyar, revised by Shrinivas Gupta, Law of Sale of Goods Act, 9th Edition, 2010
5. William Livesey Burdick, The Principles of Roman Law and Their Relation to Modern Law,      Page 445-446, Law Book Exchange Ltd, 3rd Edition, 2007 
6. Robert W Emerson, Business Law, 4th Edition, 2004

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details